The Independent Report provides an independent, non-partisan, non-ideological analysis of economic news. The Independent Report's mission is to inform its readers about the unsustainable nature of our economic system and the various stresses encumbering it: high debt levels (government, business, household); debt growth exceeding economic growth; low productivity growth; huge and persistent trade deficits; plus concurrent stock, bond and housing bubbles.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
As Economy Continues to Wither, Fed Remains Powerless to Stop It
As of June 17, the federal funds rate stood at 0.38 percent.
The funds rate is the Fed’s benchmark rate — the one that affects other interest rates. When you hear about the Federal Reserve raising or lowering interest "rates," it is just raising or lowering this single rate. Other rates simply follow the funds rate.
For perspective, the funds rate has averaged 6 percent since 1971, meaning is extraordinarily low at present and has been since December 2008, when the Fed dropped it to zero in response to the Great Recession.
Two years ago, former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke commented that he didn’t expect to see the federal funds rate above 4 percent again in his lifetime.
Bernanke was age 60 at the time. I’ll bet he expects to live into his eighties. That’s a mighty long time for the funds rate to remain so historically low.
Lowering the funds rate so drastically was supposed to lift the economy out of its doldrums. That hasn't really happened.
Though we are no longer gripped by the specter of the Great Recession, the economy remains weak by normal standards.
The economy expanded just 0.8 percent in the first quarter, the weakest growth rate in two years. That followed a weak 1.4 percent growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2015.
For all of 2015, the economy grew at a 2.4 percent pace, which isn’t very good from a historical perspective.
From 1947 through 2015, the annual GDP growth rate in the US averaged 3.26 percent.
Yet, last week, the Federal Reserve lowered its forecast for U.S. economic growth in 2016 to 2 percent, down from an earlier 2.2 percent projection. It was the second time this year that the Fed lowered its expectations for economic growth — the projection in December was 2.4 percent.
In other words, the economy is expected to be weaker this year than last year, when it wasn’t all that strong anyway.
The Fed also slightly decreased its projection for economic growth in 2017. This is an ugly pattern.
The U.S. economy added just 38,000 jobs in May, the worst monthly gain since 2010. It shocked many economists and speaks to the trouble that may lie ahead.
Additionally, the labor force participation rate – those with jobs or looking for one – declined again to 62.6 percent. That makes the unemployment number appear better than it really is. People not actively looking for work aren’t counted as unemployed. The last time the participation rate was this low was October, 1977.
Consumer spending accounts for about two-thirds of the U.S. economy, and consumers simply don’t have enough income to lift the economy.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median household income for the United States was $53,657 in 2014, the latest data available (2015 Census data will be released in September).
Real median household income peaked at $57,936 in 2007 and is now $4,279 (7.39%) lower.
Since falling to a post peak low of $52,970 in 2012, real median household income in the United States has grown by just $687 (1.30%).
Most striking, household income is now about the same as it was in 1996 — 20 years ago!
Rents, health insurance, prescription drug costs and tuition have all risen -- and are still rising -- much faster than the general rate of inflation and, more importantly, much faster than median family income.
So, let’s circle back to the federal funds rate, where we began.
Banks make their money by lending money and collecting interest payments. They hate interest rates being this low.
The Federal Reserve doesn’t want rates this low because it exists to serve the interests of the private banks that own and control it.
But it can't raise the funds rate because the economy is too weak to handle it.
When the next recession or financial crisis strikes, the Fed will want to be able to lower the funds rate in response as a means of stimulus.
But with the funds rate at 0.38 percent, there is little room to maneuver.
The Fed is out of answers and out of ammunition in its fight to stimulate and invigorate the economy. The lack of results has got to be very frustrating, and frightening, to the central bankers.
History and the economic text books say this isn’t supposed to be happening. After all previous recessions, the economy took off like a rocket.
The Fed has its hands on the wheel, but it has no control. Events have gotten ahead of it, and it is simply along for the ride.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment